Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the m68k tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 09:41:54 +1000

Hi all,

[forgot the conflict resolution ...]

On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 09:27:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   5b9bfb8ec467 ("m68k: mac: Use time64_t in RTC handling")
> 
> from the m68k tree and commit:
> 
>   ebd722275f9c ("macintosh/via-pmu: Replace via-pmu68k driver with via-pmu driver")
> 
> from the powerpc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
index 19e9d8eef1f2,28090a44fa09..3534aa6a4dc2
--- a/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
@@@ -90,11 -85,11 +90,11 @@@ static void cuda_write_pram(int offset
  }
  #endif /* CONFIG_ADB_CUDA */
  
- #ifdef CONFIG_ADB_PMU68K
+ #ifdef CONFIG_ADB_PMU
 -static long pmu_read_time(void)
 +static time64_t pmu_read_time(void)
  {
  	struct adb_request req;
 -	long time;
 +	time64_t time;
  
  	if (pmu_request(&req, NULL, 1, PMU_READ_RTC) < 0)
  		return 0;