Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:54:00 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/core/filter.c

between commit:

  b13b8787c95c ("bpf: Fix IPv6 dport byte order in bpf_sk_lookup_udp")

from the bpf tree and commit:

  c8123ead13a5 ("bpf: Extend the sk_lookup() helper to XDP hookpoint.")

from the bpf-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/core/filter.c
index 9a1327eb25fa,53d50fb75ea1..000000000000
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@@ -4852,19 -4867,19 +4867,18 @@@ static struct sock *sk_lookup(struct ne
  	} else {
  		struct in6_addr *src6 = (struct in6_addr *)&tuple->ipv6.saddr;
  		struct in6_addr *dst6 = (struct in6_addr *)&tuple->ipv6.daddr;
- 		int sdif = inet6_sdif(skb);
 -		u16 hnum = ntohs(tuple->ipv6.dport);
  
  		if (proto == IPPROTO_TCP)
- 			sk = __inet6_lookup(net, &tcp_hashinfo, skb, 0,
+ 			sk = __inet6_lookup(net, &tcp_hashinfo, NULL, 0,
  					    src6, tuple->ipv6.sport,
 -					    dst6, hnum,
 +					    dst6, ntohs(tuple->ipv6.dport),
  					    dif, sdif, &refcounted);
  		else if (likely(ipv6_bpf_stub))
  			sk = ipv6_bpf_stub->udp6_lib_lookup(net,
  							    src6, tuple->ipv6.sport,
 -							    dst6, hnum,
 +							    dst6, tuple->ipv6.dport,
  							    dif, sdif,
- 							    &udp_table, skb);
+ 							    &udp_table, NULL);
  #endif
  	}