Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sparc-next tree with the dma-mapping tree

From: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:44:20 +0100

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 09:30:42AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the sparc-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/sparc/kernel/ioport.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   53b7670e5735 ("sparc: factor the dma coherent mapping into helper")
> 
> from the dma-mapping tree and commit:
> 
>   86ef771ed543 ("sparc: Use DT node full_name instead of name for resources")
> 
> from the sparc-next tree.

Dave, Sam:

should I just apply a version of Rob's tree that takes the refactoring
into account to the dma-mapping tree?  That way we should get the right
result independent of the merge order.