From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>, Networking <netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet•com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen•de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the ipsec tree
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 13:01:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190501130157.27fb69cd@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426114120.73e906e3@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4389 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:41:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 8742dc86d0c7 ("xfrm4: Fix uninitialized memory read in _decode_session4")
>
> from the ipsec tree and commit:
>
> c53ac41e3720 ("xfrm: remove decode_session indirection from afinfo_policy")
>
> from the ipsec-next tree.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:37:41 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] xfrm4: fix up for moved _decode_session4
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index 410233c5681e..7a43ae6b2a44 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -3264,7 +3264,8 @@ static void
> decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> {
> const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> - u8 *xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> + int ihl = iph->ihl;
> + u8 *xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> struct flowi4 *fl4 = &fl->u.ip4;
> int oif = 0;
>
> @@ -3275,6 +3276,11 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> fl4->flowi4_mark = skb->mark;
> fl4->flowi4_oif = reverse ? skb->skb_iif : oif;
>
> + fl4->flowi4_proto = iph->protocol;
> + fl4->daddr = reverse ? iph->saddr : iph->daddr;
> + fl4->saddr = reverse ? iph->daddr : iph->saddr;
> + fl4->flowi4_tos = iph->tos;
> +
> if (!ip_is_fragment(iph)) {
> switch (iph->protocol) {
> case IPPROTO_UDP:
> @@ -3286,7 +3292,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
> __be16 *ports;
>
> - xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> + xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> ports = (__be16 *)xprth;
>
> fl4->fl4_sport = ports[!!reverse];
> @@ -3298,7 +3304,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 2 - skb->data)) {
> u8 *icmp;
>
> - xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> + xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> icmp = xprth;
>
> fl4->fl4_icmp_type = icmp[0];
> @@ -3310,7 +3316,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
> __be32 *ehdr;
>
> - xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> + xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> ehdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
>
> fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = ehdr[0];
> @@ -3321,7 +3327,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 8 - skb->data)) {
> __be32 *ah_hdr;
>
> - xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> + xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> ah_hdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
>
> fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = ah_hdr[1];
> @@ -3332,7 +3338,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> pskb_may_pull(skb, xprth + 4 - skb->data)) {
> __be16 *ipcomp_hdr;
>
> - xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> + xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> ipcomp_hdr = (__be16 *)xprth;
>
> fl4->fl4_ipsec_spi = htonl(ntohs(ipcomp_hdr[1]));
> @@ -3344,7 +3350,7 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> __be16 *greflags;
> __be32 *gre_hdr;
>
> - xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + iph->ihl * 4;
> + xprth = skb_network_header(skb) + ihl * 4;
> greflags = (__be16 *)xprth;
> gre_hdr = (__be32 *)xprth;
>
> @@ -3360,10 +3366,6 @@ decode_session4(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl, bool reverse)
> break;
> }
> }
> - fl4->flowi4_proto = iph->protocol;
> - fl4->daddr = reverse ? iph->saddr : iph->daddr;
> - fl4->saddr = reverse ? iph->daddr : iph->saddr;
> - fl4->flowi4_tos = iph->tos;
> }
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
This is now a conflict between the net and net-next trees.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-01 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-26 1:41 linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the ipsec tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-01 3:01 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2019-05-09 1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190501130157.27fb69cd@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=fw@strlen$(echo .)de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox