public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb•com>
To: "Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu•org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>, <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next build failure on arm64 with CMA but !NUMA
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:37:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200318153702.GA22501@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200318114109.GA65068@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:41:09PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Roman,
> 882d60d2ce725381236a158204d7ec13ff19ab25 in linux-next broke compilation
> on arm64 CMA && !NUMA like
> 
>   CC      kernel/irq/irqdesc.o
> mm/hugetlb.c: In function ‘hugetlb_cma_reserve’:
> mm/hugetlb.c:5449:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘for_each_mem_pfn_range’; did you mean ‘for_each_mem_range’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, NULL) {
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>    for_each_mem_range
> mm/hugetlb.c:5449:61: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘{’ token
>    for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, NULL) {
>                                                              ^~
> Reverting that fixes the build for the moment. Would making all of this
> dependent on CMA && NUMA be the right fix?

Hello Guido!

Thank you for the report!

We've been discussing the issue for a couple of days, and I've proposed a fix.
I've just resent it to linux-mm@ (you're in cc), so hopefully it will be merged today.

Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2020-03-18 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-18 11:41 linux-next build failure on arm64 with CMA but !NUMA Guido Günther
2020-03-18 15:37 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200318153702.GA22501@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com \
    --to=guro@fb$(echo .)com \
    --cc=agx@sigxcpu$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox