public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox•net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel•org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon•co.jp>,
	Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare•com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:11:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200723121112.5f15950a@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722132143.700a5ccc@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1081 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:21:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   net/ipv4/udp.c
>   net/ipv6/udp.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   efc6b6f6c311 ("udp: Improve load balancing for SO_REUSEPORT.")
> 
> from the net tree and commits:
> 
>   7629c73a1466 ("udp: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group")
>   2a08748cd384 ("udp6: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group")
> 
> from the bpf-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I wasn't sure how to proceed, so I used the latter
> version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far
> as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the net-next and net trees.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-23  2:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-22  3:21 linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-22 12:17 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-22 14:42   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2020-07-22 15:02     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-22 15:05       ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-07-22 15:25         ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-22 15:49           ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-07-22 17:14             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-07-23  2:11 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-29  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-29 18:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-29 21:17   ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-03-28  1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-28  1:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-15 23:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-01  1:11 Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-25  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-19 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-13 23:32 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-15 23:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-26 22:14 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-27  1:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-03-27  9:26   ` Luca Boccassi
2019-03-27 15:15     ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200723121112.5f15950a@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=ast@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon$(echo .)co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox