public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner•io>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt•com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan•com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive•com>,
	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz•ch>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the risc-v tree
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:39:43 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200805103943.3c28da7f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200713165846.5166ff82@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1444 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:58:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/riscv/Kconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   95ce6c73da3b ("riscv: Enable context tracking")
>   929f6a183839 ("riscv: Add kmemleak support")
> 
> from the risc-v tree and commit:
> 
>   140c8180eb7c ("arch: remove HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS")
> 
> from the pidfd tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 76a0cfad3367,f6a3a2bea3d8..000000000000
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@@ -57,9 -52,6 +57,8 @@@ config RISC
>   	select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
>   	select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
>   	select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS
>  +	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> - 	select HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS
>  +	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
>   	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if MMU
>   	select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if MMU
>   	select HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG if FUTEX

This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-05  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-13  6:58 linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the risc-v tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-05  0:39 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-08-05  1:17   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2020-08-05  3:41     ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200805103943.3c28da7f@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=christian@brauner$(echo .)io \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt$(echo .)com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan$(echo .)com \
    --cc=tklauser@distanz$(echo .)ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox