Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the netfilter tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:11:13 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c

between commit:

  42f1c2712090 ("netfilter: nftables: comment indirect serialization of commit_mutex with rtnl_mutex")

from the netfilter tree and commit:

  872f69034194 ("treewide: rename nla_strlcpy to nla_strscpy.")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 9a080767667b,a11bc8dcaa82..000000000000
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@@ -1722,11 -1723,7 +1723,11 @@@ static struct nft_hook *nft_netdev_hook
  		goto err_hook_alloc;
  	}
  
- 	nla_strlcpy(ifname, attr, IFNAMSIZ);
+ 	nla_strscpy(ifname, attr, IFNAMSIZ);
 +	/* nf_tables_netdev_event() is called under rtnl_mutex, this is
 +	 * indirectly serializing all the other holders of the commit_mutex with
 +	 * the rtnl_mutex.
 +	 */
  	dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifname);
  	if (!dev) {
  		err = -ENOENT;