Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with the arm64 tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:52:19 +1100

Hi all,

On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:27:47 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   072e3d96a79a ("arm64: hibernate: move page handling function to new trans_pgd.c")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   ae3c107cd8be ("numa: Move numa implementation to common code")
> 
> from the risc-v tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> index 77222d92667a,cd60e4fed78f..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/Makefile
> @@@ -6,8 -6,6 +6,7 @@@ obj-y				:= dma-mapping.o extable.o fau
>   obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)	+= hugetlbpage.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_CORE)	+= ptdump.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS)	+= ptdump_debugfs.o
>  +obj-$(CONFIG_TRANS_TABLE)	+= trans_pgd.o
> - obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA)		+= numa.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL)	+= physaddr.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE)		+= mteswap.o
>   KASAN_SANITIZE_physaddr.o	+= n

With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell