Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:58:05 +1000

Hi Nadav,

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:45:38 +0000 Nadav Amit <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> >  static void __init kvm_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
> >  {
> >  	/*
> > @@@ -655,15 -668,9 +673,9 @@@ static void __init kvm_guest_init(void
> > 
> >  	if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME)) {
> >  		has_steal_clock = 1;
> > -		pv_ops.time.steal_clock = kvm_steal_clock;
> > +		static_call_update(pv_steal_clock, kvm_steal_clock);  
> 
> I do not understand how this line ended in the merge fix though.
> 
> Not that it is correct or wrong, but it is not part of either of
> these 2 patches AFAIK.

It came from another patch that did not cause a conflict but ended up
in the diff output.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell