public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel•org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:09:28 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210817170928.7980e4bb@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2312 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:

  kernel/time/tick-internal.h

between commits:

  8c3b5e6ec0fe ("hrtimer: Ensure timerfd notification for HIGHRES=n")
  a761a67f591a ("timekeeping: Distangle resume and clock-was-set events")
  17a1b8826b45 ("hrtimer: Add bases argument to clock_was_set()")

from the tip tree and commit:

  a5e8561a2bdf ("clocksource: Make clocksource-wdtest.c safe for slow-HZ systems")

from the rcu tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc kernel/time/tick-internal.h
index 3548f0829e6d,5459bab2f4f7..000000000000
--- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
@@@ -166,14 -166,22 +166,34 @@@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer_cpu_base
  extern u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem);
  void timer_clear_idle(void);
  
 +#define CLOCK_SET_WALL							\
 +	(BIT(HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME) | BIT(HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME_SOFT) |	\
 +	 BIT(HRTIMER_BASE_TAI) | BIT(HRTIMER_BASE_TAI_SOFT))
 +
 +#define CLOCK_SET_BOOT							\
 +	(BIT(HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME) | BIT(HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME_SOFT))
 +
 +void clock_was_set(unsigned int bases);
 +void clock_was_set_delayed(void);
 +
 +void hrtimers_resume_local(void);
++
+ /* Since jiffies uses a simple TICK_NSEC multiplier
+  * conversion, the .shift value could be zero. However
+  * this would make NTP adjustments impossible as they are
+  * in units of 1/2^.shift. Thus we use JIFFIES_SHIFT to
+  * shift both the nominator and denominator the same
+  * amount, and give ntp adjustments in units of 1/2^8
+  *
+  * The value 8 is somewhat carefully chosen, as anything
+  * larger can result in overflows. TICK_NSEC grows as HZ
+  * shrinks, so values greater than 8 overflow 32bits when
+  * HZ=100.
+  */
+ #if HZ < 34
+ #define JIFFIES_SHIFT	6
+ #elif HZ < 67
+ #define JIFFIES_SHIFT	7
+ #else
+ #define JIFFIES_SHIFT	8
+ #endif

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-17  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-17  7:09 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-27  1:55 linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-06  2:45 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-06 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-21 18:17 broonie
2021-10-12  4:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-13 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-06-23  5:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-22  4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-22  4:47 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-22  5:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-22 17:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-09  4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-29  6:23 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-26  3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-25  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-25  3:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-24  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-24  4:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-29  6:22 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-29  6:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-29 14:15   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-29 23:38     ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-25  3:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-25  3:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-25 21:31   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-19  0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-19  1:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-19  1:31   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-19  8:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 13:38       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-12-16 23:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-22  2:27 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-26 19:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-10  2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-22  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-31  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-31 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01  0:04   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-08-01  4:03     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01  4:25       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-08-01 16:31         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-08-01 13:43       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-01 13:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 14:15           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-01 14:17             ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-01 14:02         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-08-01 14:15           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-01 15:40             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-08-01 21:36             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-07-18  5:26 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19  3:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-06-09  5:14 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-09 15:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-03-04  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-04 15:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-16  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-07  3:56 Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-24  4:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-24  4:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-05  3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-05 16:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-05 17:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-23  3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-23  3:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-22  4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-22  5:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-22  4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-22  5:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-20  4:47 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-20 15:17 ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210817170928.7980e4bb@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox