public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV•linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm•com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel•org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:03:54 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217100354.73b552d9@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1081 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  arch/x86/um/Kconfig

between commit:

  b62a8486de3a ("elfcore: Replace CONFIG_{IA64, UML} checks with a new option")

from the arm64 tree and commit:

  6692531df62d ("uml/x86: use x86 load_unaligned_zeropad()")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/x86/um/Kconfig
index ead7e5b3a975,4eb47d3ba625..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
@@@ -8,7 -8,7 +8,8 @@@ endmen
  
  config UML_X86
  	def_bool y
 +	select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_EXTRA_PHDRS if X86_32
+ 	select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
  
  config 64BIT
  	bool "64-bit kernel" if "$(SUBARCH)" = "x86"

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-16 23:03 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2022-03-24  7:29 ` linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220217100354.73b552d9@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox