From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel•org>
Cc: broonie@kernel•org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel•org>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat•com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the modules tree
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:13:07 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220228161307.0467e4e1@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YhWAjCTPp3hhxEOG@bombadil.infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1785 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 16:32:12 -0800 Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel•org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report Mark. Aaron, did you fix this issue on your latest
> series?
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 04:07:21PM +0000, broonie@kernel•org wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (KCONFIG_NAME)
This was a powerpc ppc64_defconfig build.
> > failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
> > from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/container_of.h:5,
> > from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/list.h:5,
> > from /tmp/next/build/include/linux/module.h:12,
> > from /tmp/next/build/kernel/module/strict_rwx.c:8:
> > /tmp/next/build/kernel/module/strict_rwx.c: In function 'frob_rodata':
> > /tmp/next/build/kernel/module/strict_rwx.c:16:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'PAGE_ALIGNED'; did you mean 'IS_ALIGNED'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 16 | BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(layout->base));
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > /tmp/next/build/include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
> > 78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
> > | ^
> > /tmp/next/build/kernel/module/strict_rwx.c:16:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUG_ON'
> > 16 | BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(layout->base));
> > | ^~~~~~
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > e5973a14d18 ("module: Move strict rwx support to a separate file")
> >
> > I have used the -next tree from the 17th.
I am still getting this build failure.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-28 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 16:07 linux-next: build failure after merge of the modules tree broonie
2022-02-23 0:32 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-28 5:13 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2022-02-28 18:16 ` Luis Chamberlain
[not found] <mb_jUGmjgayTheAB5ZLGso-I856wAQhMkb6zPGnzUyAoUjhzm-QIzkGPLTe-sPI29ax91vO1D3aVy6J7rdTtgg==@protonmail.internalid>
2025-11-04 4:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-04 10:15 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-11-05 4:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-05 6:15 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-12-04 22:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-02 1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-14 0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-14 8:01 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-11-14 9:08 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-02-09 10:08 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-09 15:16 ` Jessica Yu
2021-02-09 16:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 21:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-10 8:06 ` Jessica Yu
2021-02-10 8:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-11 6:19 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-10 12:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-10 16:16 ` Jessica Yu
2019-06-25 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-01 20:23 Mark Brown
2015-12-02 3:23 ` Rusty Russell
2015-11-27 1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-27 2:57 ` Rusty Russell
2015-06-25 6:54 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-25 9:51 ` Dan Streetman
2015-06-24 1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-24 18:18 ` Dan Streetman
2015-06-24 22:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-25 1:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-18 2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-07 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-07 11:37 ` Rusty Russell
2014-08-07 13:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-07 13:07 ` Rusty Russell
2014-08-08 1:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-28 3:58 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-28 11:38 ` Rusty Russell
2014-03-25 3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2014-03-31 3:45 ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-26 4:10 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-28 11:02 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-12-03 0:29 ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-02 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-02 3:16 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220228161307.0467e4e1@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=atomlin@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=broonie@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox