public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv•linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel•dk>, Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb•com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 08:54:35 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220524085435.1763fcfb@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523122827.657f2ab8@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1344 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 23 May 2022 12:28:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/io_uring.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   4329490a78b6 ("io_uring_enter(): don't leave f.flags uninitialized")
> 
> from the vfs tree and commit:
> 
>   3e813c902672 ("io_uring: rework io_uring_enter to simplify return value")
> 
> from the block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc fs/io_uring.c
> index 82a1eac73de7,fd47002e669d..000000000000
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@@ -10840,8 -12060,9 +12060,8 @@@ iopoll_locked
>   out:
>   	percpu_ref_put(&ctx->refs);
>   out_fput:
>  -	if (!(flags & IORING_ENTER_REGISTERED_RING))
>  -		fdput(f);
>  +	fdput(f);
> - 	return submitted ? submitted : ret;
> + 	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS


This is now a conflict between Linus' tree and the vfs tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-23  2:28 linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-23  2:58 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-23 22:54 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-10  2:34 Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-14  1:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-28  0:20 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-15  3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-14  2:08 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-14 16:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-15  0:52   ` Al Viro
2022-07-15  1:04     ` Al Viro
2022-07-18  2:59       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-18  4:58         ` Al Viro
2022-07-19 16:52           ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-20  2:45             ` Al Viro
2022-07-20  3:00               ` Jens Axboe
2022-07-11  3:57 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-11  3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-27  3:24 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-20  1:36 Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-20  5:34 ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-20  1:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-20  2:45     ` Jens Axboe
2020-01-20  2:57       ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-29  4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-29  4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-29  8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-29 14:22   ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-29 21:40     ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-29 22:17       ` Jens Axboe
2017-02-02  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-21 22:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-12  1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-12  1:44 ` Al Viro
2016-12-12  2:00 ` Ming Lei
2015-02-09  3:55 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-27  3:57 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-27  4:00 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-27  4:54   ` Al Viro
2015-01-28 17:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-29  5:15       ` Al Viro
2015-02-01  5:56         ` Al Viro
2015-02-02  8:06           ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-04-04  2:16 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-18  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-18 15:37 ` H Hartley Sweeten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220524085435.1763fcfb@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=axboe@kernel$(echo .)dk \
    --cc=dylany@fb$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox