From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail•com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule•net>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with the bitmap tree
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 16:58:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704165841.1637cfff@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3387 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the mm tree got a conflict in:
include/linux/cpumask.h
between commits:
50e413c31800 ("lib/cpumask: change return types to unsigned")
e32bd0390739 ("lib/cpumask: move one-line wrappers around find_bit to the header")
from the bitmap tree and commits:
2b0b9f2665b2 ("cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption")
284d22458843 ("cpumask: update cpumask_next_wrap() signature")
from the mm tree.
I fixed it up (I hope, see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc include/linux/cpumask.h
index 0738a6c9be40,523857884ae4..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@@ -274,29 -179,31 +195,47 @@@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next
return find_next_zero_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), nr_cpumask_bits, n+1);
}
-int __pure cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *, const struct cpumask *);
-int __pure cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);
+/**
+ * cpumask_next_and - get the next cpu in *src1p & *src2p
+ * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
+ * @src1p: the first cpumask pointer
+ * @src2p: the second cpumask pointer
+ *
+ * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no further cpus set in both.
+ */
+static inline
+unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *src1p,
+ const struct cpumask *src2p)
+{
+ /* -1 is a legal arg here. */
+ if (n != -1)
+ cpumask_check(n);
+ return find_next_and_bit(cpumask_bits(src1p), cpumask_bits(src2p),
+ nr_cpumask_bits, n + 1);
+}
+ #if NR_CPUS == 1
+ /* Uniprocessor: there is only one valid CPU */
+ static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
+ {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ static inline int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
+ const struct cpumask *src2p) {
+ return cpumask_first_and(src1p, src2p);
+ }
+
+ static inline int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp)
+ {
+ return cpumask_first(srcp);
+ }
+ #else
unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node);
-int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
+unsigned int cpumask_any_and_distribute(const struct cpumask *src1p,
const struct cpumask *src2p);
-int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
+unsigned int cpumask_any_distribute(const struct cpumask *srcp);
+ #endif /* NR_CPUS */
/**
* for_each_cpu - iterate over every cpu in a mask
@@@ -322,7 -229,7 +261,7 @@@
(cpu) = cpumask_next_zero((cpu), (mask)), \
(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
- unsigned int cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
-int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
++unsigned int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int start, bool wrap);
/**
* for_each_cpu_wrap - iterate over every cpu in a mask, starting at a specified location
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 6:58 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2022-07-04 7:26 ` linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with the bitmap tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-10 7:07 ` Sander Vanheule
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-04 7:13 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-15 11:14 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220704165841.1637cfff@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=sander@svanheule$(echo .)net \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox