Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the soundwire tree with the sound-asoc tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:29:55 +1000

Hi all,

On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 15:28:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the soundwire tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ca68202098a4 ("soundwire: intel: Migrate to new style legacy DAI naming flag")
> 
> from the sound-asoc tree and commit:
> 
>   3e9c9f90573f ("soundwire: intel: use pm_runtime_resume() on component probe")
> 
> from the soundwire tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> index 0268fa527c0c,95ce292994cc..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> @@@ -1097,9 -1114,9 +1114,10 @@@ static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops int
>   };
>   
>   static const struct snd_soc_component_driver dai_component = {
>  -	.name           = "soundwire",
>  -	.probe		= intel_component_probe,
>  -	.suspend	= intel_component_dais_suspend
>  +	.name			= "soundwire",
> ++	.probe			= intel_component_probe,
>  +	.suspend		= intel_component_dais_suspend,
>  +	.legacy_dai_naming	= 1,
>   };
>   
>   static int intel_create_dai(struct sdw_cdns *cdns,

This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and the sound tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell