Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 11:43:03 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:

  include/drm/drm_edid.h

between commit:

  c7943bb324e5 ("drm/edid: Handle EDID 1.4 range descriptor h/vfreq offsets")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  afd4429eba28 ("drm/edid: Define more flags")

from the drm-misc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/drm/drm_edid.h
index 1ed61e2b30a4,28dd80343afa..000000000000
--- a/include/drm/drm_edid.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_edid.h
@@@ -92,15 -92,13 +92,18 @@@ struct detailed_data_string 
  	u8 str[13];
  } __attribute__((packed));
  
 +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MIN_VFREQ (1 << 0) /* 1.4 */
 +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MAX_VFREQ (1 << 1) /* 1.4 */
 +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MIN_HFREQ (1 << 2) /* 1.4 */
 +#define DRM_EDID_RANGE_OFFSET_MAX_HFREQ (1 << 3) /* 1.4 */
 +
- #define DRM_EDID_DEFAULT_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG   0x00
- #define DRM_EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG     0x01
- #define DRM_EDID_SECONDARY_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x02
- #define DRM_EDID_CVT_SUPPORT_FLAG           0x04
+ #define DRM_EDID_DEFAULT_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG   0x00 /* 1.3 */
+ #define DRM_EDID_RANGE_LIMITS_ONLY_FLAG     0x01 /* 1.4 */
+ #define DRM_EDID_SECONDARY_GTF_SUPPORT_FLAG 0x02 /* 1.3 */
+ #define DRM_EDID_CVT_SUPPORT_FLAG           0x04 /* 1.4 */
+ 
+ #define DRM_EDID_CVT_FLAGS_STANDARD_BLANKING (1 << 3)
+ #define DRM_EDID_CVT_FLAGS_REDUCED_BLANKING  (1 << 4)
  
  struct detailed_data_monitor_range {
  	u8 min_vfreq;