Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with the btrfs-fixes tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 10:28:28 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/btrfs/ctree.h

between commit:

  8184620ae212 ("btrfs: fix lost file sync on direct IO write with nowait and dsync iocb")

from the btrfs-fixes tree and commit:

  d98f802c975e ("btrfs: move inode prototypes to btrfs_inode.h")

from the btrfs tree.

I fixed it up (I used the latter version of this file and applied the
following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is
now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 10:24:24 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "btrfs: fix lost file sync on direct IO write with nowait and dsync iocb"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
---
 fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
index 79a9f06c2434..d21c30bf7053 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
@@ -526,7 +526,10 @@ ssize_t btrfs_encoded_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
 ssize_t btrfs_do_encoded_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from,
 			       const struct btrfs_ioctl_encoded_io_args *encoded);
 
-ssize_t btrfs_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, size_t done_before);
+ssize_t btrfs_dio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
+		       size_t done_before);
+struct iomap_dio *btrfs_dio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
+				  size_t done_before);
 
 extern const struct dentry_operations btrfs_dentry_operations;
 
-- 
2.35.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell