Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the iommu tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:10:54 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c

between commit:

  757636ed2607 ("iommu: Rename iommu-sva-lib.{c,h}")

from the iommu tree and commits:

  e79114b17b81 ("iommu/sva: Replace pasid_valid() helper with mm_valid_pasid()")
  53e220bbaa51 ("x86/mm/iommu/sva: Make LAM and SVA mutually exclusive")

from the tip tree.

The file was renamed in the former, so I deleted it and applied the
following merge resolution patch.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:36:45 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "iommu: Rename iommu-sva-lib.{c,h}"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
index 24bf9b2b58aa..af05dd9f2a6f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 /*
  * Helpers for IOMMU drivers implementing SVA
  */
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_context.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 #include <linux/iommu.h>
@@ -32,21 +34,31 @@ int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
 	    min == 0 || max < min)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Serialize against address tagging enabling */
+	if (mmap_write_lock_killable(mm))
+		return -EINTR;
+
+	if (!arch_pgtable_dma_compat(mm)) {
+		mmap_write_unlock(mm);
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
 	mutex_lock(&iommu_sva_lock);
 	/* Is a PASID already associated with this mm? */
-	if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) {
+	if (mm_valid_pasid(mm)) {
 		if (mm->pasid < min || mm->pasid >= max)
 			ret = -EOVERFLOW;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	pasid = ioasid_alloc(&iommu_sva_pasid, min, max, mm);
-	if (!pasid_valid(pasid))
+	if (pasid == INVALID_IOASID)
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 	else
 		mm_pasid_set(mm, pasid);
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock);
+	mmap_write_unlock(mm);
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_alloc_pasid);
-- 
2.35.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell