Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the btrfs tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 11:20:23 +1000

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:

  fs/btrfs/inode.c

between commit:

  ea6aa58a9229 ("btrfs: copy dir permission and time when creating a stub subvolume")

from the btrfs tree and commit:

  2a9462de4352 ("btrfs: convert to ctime accessor functions")

from the vfs-brauner tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 06c9ad527458,db7e1a19bb67..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@@ -5558,12 -5757,9 +5555,11 @@@ static struct inode *new_simple_dir(str
  	inode->i_opflags &= ~IOP_XATTR;
  	inode->i_fop = &simple_dir_operations;
  	inode->i_mode = S_IFDIR | S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR | S_IXUGO;
- 	inode->i_mtime = current_time(inode);
+ 	inode->i_mtime = inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
 -	inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime;
 +	inode->i_atime = dir->i_atime;
- 	inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime;
  	BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime = inode->i_mtime;
 +	inode->i_uid = dir->i_uid;
 +	inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid;
  
  	return inode;
  }