Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:21:59 +1000

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c

between commit:

  fa165e194997 ("sfc: don't unregister flow_indr if it was never registered")

from the net tree and commit:

  3bf969e88ada ("sfc: add MAE table machinery for conntrack table")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
index fe268b6c1cac,246657222958..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
@@@ -1657,11 -2087,17 +2087,17 @@@ int efx_init_tc(struct efx_nic *efx
  	rc = efx_tc_configure_fallback_acts_reps(efx);
  	if (rc)
  		return rc;
- 	rc = flow_indr_dev_register(efx_tc_indr_setup_cb, efx);
+ 	rc = efx_mae_get_tables(efx);
  	if (rc)
  		return rc;
 -	efx->tc->up = true;
+ 	rc = flow_indr_dev_register(efx_tc_indr_setup_cb, efx);
+ 	if (rc)
+ 		goto out_free;
 +	efx->tc->up = true;
  	return 0;
+ out_free:
+ 	efx_mae_free_tables(efx);
+ 	return rc;
  }
  
  void efx_fini_tc(struct efx_nic *efx)