Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the djw-vfs tree with the xfs tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 09:33:47 +1000

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the djw-vfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c

between commit:

  526aab5f5790 ("xfs: implement online scrubbing of rtsummary info")

from the xfs tree and commit:

  ce85a1e04645 ("xfs: stabilize fs summary counters for online fsck")

from the djw-vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c
index e92129d74462,a0fffbcd022b..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c
@@@ -178,16 -178,16 +178,18 @@@ xchk_teardown
  	}
  	if (sc->ip) {
  		if (sc->ilock_flags)
 -			xfs_iunlock(sc->ip, sc->ilock_flags);
 -		if (sc->ip != ip_in &&
 -		    !xfs_internal_inum(sc->mp, sc->ip->i_ino))
 -			xchk_irele(sc, sc->ip);
 +			xchk_iunlock(sc, sc->ilock_flags);
 +		xchk_irele(sc, sc->ip);
  		sc->ip = NULL;
  	}
- 	if (sc->sm->sm_flags & XFS_SCRUB_IFLAG_REPAIR)
+ 	if (sc->flags & XCHK_HAVE_FREEZE_PROT) {
+ 		sc->flags &= ~XCHK_HAVE_FREEZE_PROT;
  		mnt_drop_write_file(sc->file);
+ 	}
 +	if (sc->xfile) {
 +		xfile_destroy(sc->xfile);
 +		sc->xfile = NULL;
 +	}
  	if (sc->buf) {
  		if (sc->buf_cleanup)
  			sc->buf_cleanup(sc->buf);