Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the exfat tree with Linus' tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 11:24:39 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the exfat tree got conflicts in:

  fs/exfat/inode.c
  fs/exfat/super.c

between commit:

  4c72a36edd54 ("exfat: convert to new timestamp accessors")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  d76271feecc1 ("exfat: add ioctls for accessing attributes")

from the exfat tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/exfat/inode.c
index a2185e6f0548,edcd8a5c38d1..000000000000
--- a/fs/exfat/inode.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/inode.c
@@@ -400,9 -397,9 +400,9 @@@ static int exfat_write_end(struct file 
  	if (err < len)
  		exfat_write_failed(mapping, pos+len);
  
- 	if (!(err < 0) && !(ei->attr & ATTR_ARCHIVE)) {
+ 	if (!(err < 0) && !(ei->attr & EXFAT_ATTR_ARCHIVE)) {
 -		inode->i_mtime = inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
 +		inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode, inode_set_ctime_current(inode));
- 		ei->attr |= ATTR_ARCHIVE;
+ 		ei->attr |= EXFAT_ATTR_ARCHIVE;
  		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
  	}
  
diff --cc fs/exfat/super.c
index e919a68bf4a1,e7cba540c99e..000000000000
--- a/fs/exfat/super.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/super.c
@@@ -369,9 -376,9 +376,9 @@@ static int exfat_read_root(struct inod
  	ei->i_size_aligned = i_size_read(inode);
  	ei->i_size_ondisk = i_size_read(inode);
  
- 	exfat_save_attr(inode, ATTR_SUBDIR);
+ 	exfat_save_attr(inode, EXFAT_ATTR_SUBDIR);
 -	inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = ei->i_crtime = inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
 -	exfat_truncate_atime(&inode->i_atime);
 +	ei->i_crtime = simple_inode_init_ts(inode);
 +	exfat_truncate_inode_atime(inode);
  	return 0;
  }