Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:13:35 +1100

Hi all,

After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8650-lpass-lpi.c:232:10: error: 'const struct lpi_pinctrl_variant_data' has no member named 'flags'
  232 |         .flags = LPI_FLAG_SLEW_RATE_SAME_REG,
      |          ^~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8650-lpass-lpi.c:232:18: error: 'LPI_FLAG_SLEW_RATE_SAME_REG' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG'?
  232 |         .flags = LPI_FLAG_SLEW_RATE_SAME_REG,
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                  LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8650-lpass-lpi.c:232:18: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8650-lpass-lpi.c:232:18: note: (near initialization for 'sm8650_lpi_data')
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Caused by commit

  c4e47673853f ("pinctrl: qcom: sm8650-lpass-lpi: add SM8650 LPASS")

I have used the pinctrl tree from next-20231113 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell