Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm tree

From: Andrew Morton <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:32:02 -0800

On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:04:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
> > > index be229290a6a7..3438ab72c346 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
> > > @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ void ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> > >  	set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > >  /*
> > >   * For hash translation mode, we use the deposited table to store hash slot
> > >   * information and they are stored at PTRS_PER_PMD offset from related pmd
> > > @@ -563,6 +564,7 @@ int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
> > >  
> > >  	return true;
> > >  }
> > > +#endif
> > >  
> > >  /*
> > >   * Does the CPU support tlbie?
> > > -- 
> > > 2.40.1  
> 
> I am still carrying this patch (it should probably go into the mm
> tree).  Is someone going to pick it up (assuming it is correct)?

AFAIK we're still awaiting input from the ppc team.

I'll grab it.  If it breaks things then we-told-you-so!