Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-msm tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:59:50 +1100

Hi all,

After merging the drm-msm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c: In function 'amdgpu_seq64_map':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c:64:9: error: too few arguments to function 'drm_exec_init'
   64 |         drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c:28:
include/drm/drm_exec.h:138:6: note: declared here
  138 | void drm_exec_init(struct drm_exec *exec, uint32_t flags, unsigned nr);
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c: In function 'amdgpu_seq64_unmap':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c:125:9: error: too few arguments to function 'drm_exec_init'
  125 |         drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/drm/drm_exec.h:138:6: note: declared here
  138 | void drm_exec_init(struct drm_exec *exec, uint32_t flags, unsigned nr);
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

Caused by commit

  05d249352f1a ("drm/exec: Pass in initial # of objects")

interating with commit

  c8031019dc95 ("drm/amdgpu: Implement a new 64bit sequence memory driver")

from the drm tree.

I have applied this merge resolution patch for today;

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:53:17 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "drm/exec: Pass in initial # of objects"

interacting with
"drm/amdgpu: Implement a new 64bit sequence memory driver"

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c
index f3de02193138..7a6a67275404 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_seq64.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ int amdgpu_seq64_map(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
 	if (!bo)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT);
+	drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT, 0);
 	drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
 		r = amdgpu_vm_lock_pd(vm, &exec, 0);
 		if (likely(!r))
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void amdgpu_seq64_unmap(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv)
 
 	vm = &fpriv->vm;
 
-	drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT);
+	drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT, 0);
 	drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
 		r = amdgpu_vm_lock_pd(vm, &exec, 0);
 		if (likely(!r))
-- 
2.40.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell