Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 11 (drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c)

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 08:37:59 +1100

Hi all,

On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 08:24:54 +0100 Alexandre Ghiti <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:22 PM Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > on riscv32:
> >
> > ../drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:1015:35: error: initialization of 'int (*)(const struct ctl_table *, int,  void *, size_t *, loff_t *)' {aka 'int (*)(const struct ctl_table *, int,  void *, unsigned int *, long long int *)'} from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(struct ctl_table *, int,  void *, size_t *, loff_t *)' {aka 'int (*)(struct ctl_table *, int,  void *, unsigned int *, long long int *)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> >  1015 |                 .proc_handler   = riscv_pmu_proc_user_access_handler,
> >       |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ../drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:1015:35: note: (near initialization for 'sbi_pmu_sysctl_table[0].proc_handler')
>
> I already sent a fix for that here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email-masked]/

I have added that patch to linux-next today and will keep it until it
turns up in the sysctl tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell