From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes•org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux•ibm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia•com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe•ca>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse•de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the mm-nonmm-stable tree
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:43:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231213124302.2a6281af@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1616 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the iommu tree got a conflict in:
arch/Kconfig
between commits:
0eb5085c3874 ("arch: remove ARCH_TASK_STRUCT_ON_STACK")
3888750e21cc ("arch: remove ARCH_TASK_STRUCT_ALLOCATOR")
from the mm-nonmm-stable tree and commit:
8f23f5dba6b4 ("iommu: Change kconfig around IOMMU_SVA")
from the iommu tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/Kconfig
index bfcc7c2dc039,3e49f862670e..000000000000
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@@ -301,8 -301,22 +301,13 @@@ config ARCH_HAS_DMA_CLEAR_UNCACHE
config ARCH_HAS_CPU_FINALIZE_INIT
bool
+ # The architecture has a per-task state that includes the mm's PASID
+ config ARCH_HAS_CPU_PASID
+ bool
+ select IOMMU_MM_DATA
+
-# Select if arch init_task must go in the __init_task_data section
-config ARCH_TASK_STRUCT_ON_STACK
- bool
-
-# Select if arch has its private alloc_task_struct() function
-config ARCH_TASK_STRUCT_ALLOCATOR
- bool
-
config HAVE_ARCH_THREAD_STRUCT_WHITELIST
bool
- depends on !ARCH_TASK_STRUCT_ALLOCATOR
help
An architecture should select this to provide hardened usercopy
knowledge about what region of the thread_struct should be
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231213124302.2a6281af@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=hca@linux$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia$(echo .)com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe$(echo .)ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes$(echo .)org \
--cc=jroedel@suse$(echo .)de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox