Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the bcachefs tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:12:57 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:

  fs/bcachefs/super-io.c

between commit:

  2881c58d14b6 ("bcachefs: bch2_print_opts()")

from the bcachefs tree and commit:

  9f2f767f5ef8 ("bcachefs: port block device access to file")

from the vfs-brauner tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
index 38a5073202c5,bd64eb68e84a..000000000000
--- a/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/super-io.c
@@@ -715,12 -715,11 +715,12 @@@ retry
  			opt_set(*opts, nochanges, true);
  	}
  
- 	if (IS_ERR(sb->bdev_handle)) {
- 		ret = PTR_ERR(sb->bdev_handle);
+ 	if (IS_ERR(sb->s_bdev_file)) {
+ 		ret = PTR_ERR(sb->s_bdev_file);
 +		prt_printf(&err, "error opening %s: %s", path, bch2_err_str(ret));
  		goto err;
  	}
- 	sb->bdev = sb->bdev_handle->bdev;
+ 	sb->bdev = file_bdev(sb->s_bdev_file);
  
  	ret = bch2_sb_realloc(sb, 0);
  	if (ret) {