Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net-next tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 16:29:58 +1100

Hi all,

FIXME: Add owner of second tree to To:
       Add author(s)/SOB of conflicting commits.

Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got conflicts in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c

between commits:

  3e5fb691faee ("ice: make ice_vsi_cfg_rxq() static")
  a292ba981324 ("ice: make ice_vsi_cfg_txq() static")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  014dc22af922 ("overflow: Change DEFINE_FLEX to take __counted_by member")

from the kspp tree.

I fixed it up (I used those files from the former and applied the
following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 16:26:02 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "overflow: Change DEFINE_FLEX to take __counted_by
 member"

comflcting with commits

  3e5fb691faee ("ice: make ice_vsi_cfg_rxq() static")
  a292ba981324 ("ice: make ice_vsi_cfg_txq() static")

from the net-nect tree.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c
index d2fd315556a3..a545a7917e4f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ ice_vsi_cfg_txq(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_tx_ring *ring,
 int ice_vsi_cfg_single_txq(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_tx_ring **tx_rings,
 			   u16 q_idx)
 {
-	DEFINE_FLEX(struct ice_aqc_add_tx_qgrp, qg_buf, txqs, 1);
+	DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(struct ice_aqc_add_tx_qgrp, qg_buf, txqs, 1);
 
 	if (q_idx >= vsi->alloc_txq || !tx_rings || !tx_rings[q_idx])
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_single_txq(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_tx_ring **tx_rings,
 static int
 ice_vsi_cfg_txqs(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_tx_ring **rings, u16 count)
 {
-	DEFINE_FLEX(struct ice_aqc_add_tx_qgrp, qg_buf, txqs, 1);
+	DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(struct ice_aqc_add_tx_qgrp, qg_buf, txqs, 1);
 	int err = 0;
 	u16 q_idx;
 
-- 
2.43.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell