Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with the btrfs-fixes tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:55:25 +1000

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c

between commit:

  d202776a44d5 ("btrfs: protect folio::private when attaching extent buffer folios")

from the btrfs-fixes tree and commit:

  46cda5a0ef68 ("btrfs: fix a possible race window when allocating new extent buffers")

from the btrfs tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell