Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the nfs-anna tree with the mm-stable tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:58:36 +1000

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the fs-next tree got conflicts in:

  fs/nfs/nfstrace.h
  fs/nfs/write.c

between commit:

  237d29075ca7 ("nfs: drop usage of folio_file_pos")

from the mm-stable tree and commit:

  64568b27b2d2 ("nfs: pass explicit offset/count to trace events")

from the nfs-anna tree.

I fixed it up (for the nfstrace.h file I just used the latter, and see
below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/nfs/write.c
index 3573cdc4b28f,680505d664f0..000000000000
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@@ -279,9 -180,9 +180,9 @@@ static void nfs_grow_file(struct folio 
  	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
  	i_size = i_size_read(inode);
  	end_index = ((i_size - 1) >> folio_shift(folio)) << folio_order(folio);
- 	if (i_size > 0 && folio_index(folio) < end_index)
+ 	if (i_size > 0 && folio->index < end_index)
  		goto out;
 -	end = folio_file_pos(folio) + (loff_t)offset + (loff_t)count;
 +	end = folio_pos(folio) + (loff_t)offset + (loff_t)count;
  	if (i_size >= end)
  		goto out;
  	trace_nfs_size_grow(inode, end);
@@@ -2073,8 -2062,8 +2062,8 @@@ int nfs_wb_folio_cancel(struct inode *i
   */
  int nfs_wb_folio(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio)
  {
 -	loff_t range_start = folio_file_pos(folio);
 +	loff_t range_start = folio_pos(folio);
- 	loff_t range_end = range_start + (loff_t)folio_size(folio) - 1;
+ 	size_t len = folio_size(folio);
  	struct writeback_control wbc = {
  		.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
  		.nr_to_write = 0,