Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the slab tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 19:33:16 +1000

Hi Vlastimil,

On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:49:45 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> ... so it would have to be either slab tree from 20240905 (before it
> included the vfs commits), or vfs from 20240906 (before the commits on vfs
> side got different id's).

You need to remember that my time zone is UTC+1000 :-)

> I guess if you rolled back vfs side in -next, then it makes more sense to
> reset vfs, and if slab side, then slab.

The vfs-brauner tree is merged into linux-next earlyish in the morning.
the slab tree late in the afternoon.  My preference is to rollback the
later tree is that works.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell