Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the btrfs tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:51:29 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:

  fs/btrfs/file.c

between commit:

  377781e9e6f8 ("btrfs: drop unused parameter iov_iter from btrfs_write_check()")

from the btrfs tree and commit:

  e2e801d6e625 ("btrfs: convert to multigrain timestamps")

from the vfs-brauner tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/btrfs/file.c
index 033f85ea8c9d,e5384ceb8acf..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@@ -1124,27 -1120,7 +1124,7 @@@ void btrfs_check_nocow_unlock(struct bt
  	btrfs_drew_write_unlock(&inode->root->snapshot_lock);
  }
  
- static void update_time_for_write(struct inode *inode)
- {
- 	struct timespec64 now, ts;
- 
- 	if (IS_NOCMTIME(inode))
- 		return;
- 
- 	now = current_time(inode);
- 	ts = inode_get_mtime(inode);
- 	if (!timespec64_equal(&ts, &now))
- 		inode_set_mtime_to_ts(inode, now);
- 
- 	ts = inode_get_ctime(inode);
- 	if (!timespec64_equal(&ts, &now))
- 		inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, now);
- 
- 	if (IS_I_VERSION(inode))
- 		inode_inc_iversion(inode);
- }
- 
 -int btrfs_write_check(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from, size_t count)
 +int btrfs_write_check(struct kiocb *iocb, size_t count)
  {
  	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);