Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:41:00 +1100

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c

between commit:

  e15c5506dd39 ("net: enetc: allocate vf_state during PF probes")

from the net tree and commit:

  3774409fd4c6 ("net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
index c95a7c083b0f,a76ce41eb197..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c
@@@ -1277,12 -1024,7 +1015,13 @@@ static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_de
  	pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
  	pf->si = si;
  	pf->total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
 +	if (pf->total_vfs) {
 +		pf->vf_state = kcalloc(pf->total_vfs, sizeof(struct enetc_vf_state),
 +				       GFP_KERNEL);
 +		if (!pf->vf_state)
 +			goto err_alloc_vf_state;
 +	}
+ 	pf->ops = &enetc_pf_ops;
  
  	err = enetc_setup_mac_addresses(node, pf);
  	if (err)