public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel•org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat•com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net-next tree
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:54:01 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250326155401.634d8c79@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213151927.1674562e@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2314 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:19:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   lib/Makefile
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   b341f6fd45ab ("blackhole_dev: convert self-test to KUnit")
> 
> from the net-next tree and commit:
> 
>   db6fe4d61ece ("lib: Move KUnit tests into tests/ subdirectory")
> 
> from the kspp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the latter version of this file and applied the
> following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:50:27 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "lib: Move KUnit tests into tests/ subdirectory"
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   b341f6fd45ab ("blackhole_dev: convert self-test to KUnit")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
> ---
>  lib/tests/Makefile                    | 1 +
>  lib/{ => tests}/blackhole_dev_kunit.c | 0
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
>  rename lib/{ => tests}/blackhole_dev_kunit.c (100%)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/tests/Makefile b/lib/tests/Makefile
> index 8696d778d92f..8961fbcff7a4 100644
> --- a/lib/tests/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/tests/Makefile
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  CFLAGS_bitfield_kunit.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
>  obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) += bitfield_kunit.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += test_bits.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BLACKHOLE_DEV_KUNIT_TEST) += blackhole_dev_kunit.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CHECKSUM_KUNIT) += checksum_kunit.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CMDLINE_KUNIT_TEST) += cmdline_kunit.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPUMASK_KUNIT_TEST) += cpumask_kunit.o
> diff --git a/lib/blackhole_dev_kunit.c b/lib/tests/blackhole_dev_kunit.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from lib/blackhole_dev_kunit.c
> rename to lib/tests/blackhole_dev_kunit.c
> -- 
> 2.45.2

This is now a conflict between Linus' tree and the net-next tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-26  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13  4:19 linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-26  4:54 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-07  5:29 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-07 19:23 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-27  9:27 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-05  4:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-22  0:06 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-22  6:35 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-02-21 23:51 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-22  6:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-02-19 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-20  9:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-02-08  1:30 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250326155401.634d8c79@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kees@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=tamird@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox