public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel•org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah•com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail•com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel•org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation•org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the driver-core tree
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:21:59 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250401142159.6f468edf@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321185630.566dc075@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2871 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:56:30 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rust tree got a semantic conflict in:
> 
>   samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   7b948a2af6b5 ("rust: pci: fix unrestricted &mut pci::Device")
> 
> from the driver-core tree and commit:
> 
>   9901addae63b ("samples: rust: add Rust dma test sample driver")
> 
> from the rust tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I applied the following supplied resolution, thanks Danilo)
> and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:21:27 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "samples: rust: add Rust dma test sample driver"
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   7b948a2af6b5 ("rust: pci: fix unrestricted &mut pci::Device")
> 
> from the driver-core tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
> ---
>  samples/rust/rust_dma.rs | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs b/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
> index 908acd34b8db..874c2c964afa 100644
> --- a/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
> +++ b/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
> @@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
>  //!
>  //! To make this driver probe, QEMU must be run with `-device pci-testdev`.
>  
> -use kernel::{bindings, dma::CoherentAllocation, pci, prelude::*};
> +use kernel::{bindings, device::Core, dma::CoherentAllocation, pci, prelude::*, types::ARef};
>  
>  struct DmaSampleDriver {
> -    pdev: pci::Device,
> +    pdev: ARef<pci::Device>,
>      ca: CoherentAllocation<MyStruct>,
>  }
>  
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ impl pci::Driver for DmaSampleDriver {
>      type IdInfo = ();
>      const ID_TABLE: pci::IdTable<Self::IdInfo> = &PCI_TABLE;
>  
> -    fn probe(pdev: &mut pci::Device, _info: &Self::IdInfo) -> Result<Pin<KBox<Self>>> {
> +    fn probe(pdev: &pci::Device<Core>, _info: &Self::IdInfo) -> Result<Pin<KBox<Self>>> {
>          dev_info!(pdev.as_ref(), "Probe DMA test driver.\n");
>  
>          let ca: CoherentAllocation<MyStruct> =
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ fn probe(pdev: &mut pci::Device, _info: &Self::IdInfo) -> Result<Pin<KBox<Self>>
>  
>          let drvdata = KBox::new(
>              Self {
> -                pdev: pdev.clone(),
> +                pdev: pdev.into(),
>                  ca,
>              },
>              GFP_KERNEL,
> -- 
> 2.45.2

This is now a conflict between the driver-core tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-01  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-21  7:56 linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the driver-core tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-21 20:54 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-04-01  3:21 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-04-01  7:42   ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-20  7:11 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-20  9:15 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-11-20 11:27   ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-11-21  4:39     ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-21 12:16       ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-11-21 15:56         ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-11-21 16:07           ` Greg KH
2025-11-23 16:39             ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-11-21 19:21           ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-11-14  4:18 Stephen Rothwell
2025-12-05  3:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-10  1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-10  1:24 Stephen Rothwell
2025-12-05  3:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-23 16:44 Mark Brown
2025-09-23 16:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-23 19:24   ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-09-24  8:04     ` Mark Brown
2025-09-24  8:25       ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-09-16 13:27 Mark Brown
2025-07-23  1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-23 12:49 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-21  4:25 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-21  8:24 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-18 11:01 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-18 10:46 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-18 16:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-18 10:26 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-18 10:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-15  8:26 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-15  8:21 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-11  8:04 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-11  9:27 ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-07-11  7:59 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-11  9:48 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-01  7:46 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-01  9:12 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-14  4:46 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-14  8:39 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-23  3:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-14  4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-14  8:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-23  3:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-13  4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-13 11:13 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-23  3:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-17  3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-17  8:15 ` Greg KH
2024-12-18  0:18 ` Miguel Ojeda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250401142159.6f468edf@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=abdiel.janulgue@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=greg@kroah$(echo .)com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox