public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel•org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki•net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro•org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq-arm tree with the configfs tree
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 12:02:39 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250523120239.2ab98a68@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250521125946.664a79c1@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1609 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Wed, 21 May 2025 12:59:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the cpufreq-arm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   rust/kernel/lib.rs
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   446cafc295bf ("rust: configfs: introduce rust support for configfs")
> 
> from the configfs tree and commits:
> 
>   8961b8cb3099 ("rust: cpumask: Add initial abstractions")
>   d01d70205601 ("rust: clk: Add initial abstractions")
>   3accb57d56a9 ("rust: cpu: Add from_cpu()")
>   2207856ff0bc ("rust: cpufreq: Add initial abstractions for cpufreq framework")
> 
> from the cpufreq-arm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc rust/kernel/lib.rs
> index 354eb1605194,133ebee4f9d3..000000000000
> --- a/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/lib.rs
> @@@ -42,8 -42,11 +42,13 @@@ pub mod alloc
>   pub mod block;
>   #[doc(hidden)]
>   pub mod build_assert;
> + pub mod clk;
>  +#[cfg(CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS)]
>  +pub mod configfs;
> + pub mod cpu;
> + #[cfg(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ)]
> + pub mod cpufreq;
> + pub mod cpumask;
>   pub mod cred;
>   pub mod device;
>   pub mod device_id;

This is now a conflict between the pm tree and the configfs tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-23  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-21  2:59 linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq-arm tree with the configfs tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-23  2:02 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-13  2:03 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-23  2:03 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250523120239.2ab98a68@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki$(echo .)net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox