public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux•dev>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the bcachefs tree
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 09:23:33 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250528092333.10969c39@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250526144204.658ddfc7@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1007 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 26 May 2025 14:42:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/bcachefs/clock.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   881e64bc3a17 ("bcachefs: bch2_kthread_io_clock_wait_once()")
> 
> from the bcachefs tree and commit:
> 
>   aad823aa3a7d ("treewide, timers: Rename destroy_timer_on_stack() as timer_destroy_on_stack()")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former removed a line updated by the latter, so I
> just used that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the bcachefs tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2025-05-27 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-26  4:42 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the bcachefs tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-27 23:23 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250528092333.10969c39@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox