Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: arm-ccn: Use hrtimer_start()

From: Arnd Bergmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 17:32:05 +0200

On Wednesday 13 May 2015 16:21:24 Pawel Moll wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> index df5f307..7d9879e 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
> @@ -921,9 +921,8 @@ static void arm_ccn_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>          * attribute).
>          */
>         if (!ccn->irq)
> -               __hrtimer_start_range_ns(&ccn->dt.hrtimer,
> -                               arm_ccn_pmu_timer_period(), 0,
> -                               HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED, 0);
> +               hrtimer_start(&ccn->dt.hrtimer, arm_ccn_pmu_timer_period(),
> +                               HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
>  
>         /* Set the DT bus input, engaging the counter */
>         arm_ccn_pmu_xp_dt_config(event, 1);

Is this correct by itself, or do we need to pull in the branch that
contains c6eb3f70d44828 ("hrtimer: Get rid of hrtimer softirq")
from Thomas? The other similar patches that Thomas did contain a
comment about the conversion being safe after hrtimer_start()
no longer uses a softirq, but it is still in use in 4.1-rc3.

	Arnd