Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree

From: Jens Axboe <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:44:47 -0700

On 12/27/19 1:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:29:40 -0700 Jens Axboe <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> On 12/27/19 1:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 12/27/2019 11:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
>>>>
>>>> In commit
>>>>
>>>>   1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")
>>>>
>>>> Fixes tags
>>>>
>>>>   Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
>>>>   Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")
>>>>
>>>> have this problem:
>>>>
>>>>   - Target SHA1s do not exist
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you meant
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
>>>> Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")  
>>>
>>> Yes, those are the two that should have been used, the two commits were
>>> extracted from a downstream tree where the upstream commits ended up
>>> looking slightly different, my script does not (yet) rewrite those, Jens
>>> would you want me to resubmit or can you rewrite the commit message in
>>> place?  
>>
>> It's too late unfortunately, Linus already pulled it. So we'll have to
>> live with it, at least the commit titles are correct so it should be
>> manageable.
> 
> Unfortunately, even the titles are not correct, so they took me a
> little time to find the correct commits :-(  This means it will also
> take the stable maintainers a bit of time.

Yeah I see, the 2nd one is not. Gah, that really sucks. I'll let stable
know.

Florian, please ensure that future submissions have both the right titles
and shas.

-- 
Jens Axboe