From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs•helsinki.fi>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation•org>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle•com>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360•ro>,
vegard.nossum@gmail•com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:10:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A288F7.6060901@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080813171116.6cce0139.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> You should *never* base anything on linux-next if it is to be included in
> linux-next. What you should do is merge in Linus' latest tree (since
> that is the other side of the conflict, in this case) and you will get the
> same conflict and you can fix it in the merge that you do. Then tomorrow,
> I won't see the conflict when I do my merge of your updated tree.
OK, thanks! But what about kmemcheck then? We have conflicts there that
won't be resolved until 2.6.28. Does this mean I should grab the
kmemcheck patches to my tree now to fix them?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 4:57 linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 6:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 7:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 7:10 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-08-13 7:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 7:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 7:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-21 4:55 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03 4:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03 9:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-03 4:19 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03 4:52 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-03 9:39 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-03 4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03 9:39 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48A288F7.6060901@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs$(echo .)helsinki.fi \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360$(echo .)ro \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle$(echo .)com \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox