From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt•edu
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor•hengli.com.au>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime•net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation•org>,
linux-crypto@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:20:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49073.1319930427@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:45:44 +0200." <20111027074544.GA19905@gondor.apana.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 537 bytes --]
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:45:44 +0200, Herbert Xu said:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:05:16AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt•edu wrote:
> > Are there any use cases where a config (probably embedded) would wantq
> > CRYPTO_USER but not CRYPTO_NET? Would seem a shame to pull in the entire
>
> Since the CRYPTO_USER interface sits on top of netlink I don't
> see how you could possibly avoid NET.
Oh, OK. The original bug report looked like just some utility functions not
defined, so I didn't pick up on the "it needs netlink" aspect of it.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-29 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-25 9:36 linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25 9:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25 10:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-26 0:34 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (agp/intel-gtt.c) Randy Dunlap
2011-11-03 21:21 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-10-26 0:42 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto) Randy Dunlap
2011-10-26 6:27 ` Herbert Xu
2011-10-26 12:33 ` Stefan Richter
2011-10-26 16:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-10-26 17:15 ` Stefan Richter
2011-10-27 7:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-10-27 7:45 ` Herbert Xu
2011-10-29 23:20 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2011-10-26 18:26 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (mfd/ab8500) Randy Dunlap
2011-10-30 23:04 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-10-26 18:37 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (pci/ats.c) Randy Dunlap
2011-11-10 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-26 18:39 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (target) Randy Dunlap
2011-10-26 19:53 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-10-26 20:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-26 20:42 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-10-26 18:47 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (sb_edac.c) Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49073.1319930427@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt$(echo .)edu \
--cc=herbert@gondor$(echo .)hengli.com.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime$(echo .)net \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox