Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 19 (mtd build error)

From: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:45:52 -0800

Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:24 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:18 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> So does the dependency need to be something like
>>> "depends on SFC && MTD && !(SFC=y && MTD=m)"?
>> If it's a separate driver, perhaps it's sufficient just to make it a
>> tristate and make it depend on SFC && MTD?
> 
> It's not a separate driver.

and it already depends on SFC && MTD.  Weird that it fails like this.

-- 
~Randy