public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@petalogix•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>,
	John Williams <john.williams@petalogix•com>,
	linux-next@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: Microblaze merge
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:06:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1D3ACF.2090206@petalogix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090527181022.f69d7036.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> HI Michal,
>
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 09:22:36 +0200 Michal Simek <michal.simek@petalogix•com> wrote:
>   
>> Can you please merge my next branch to linux-next?
>>
>> The following changes since commit 5805977e63a36ad56594a623f3bd2bebcb7db233:
>>   Linus Torvalds (1):
>>         Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../jbarnes/drm-2.6
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://git.monstr.eu/linux-2.6-microblaze.git next
>>     
>
> I have added it to the end of the tree for today (you just caught me in
> time :-)).  Tomorrow it will be moved back with all the other
> architectures.
>   
;-)

> What I tell everyone: all patches/commits in the tree/series must
> have been:
>
> 	posted to a relevant mailing list
>   
was
> 	reviewed
>   
It was reviewed v1 - v2 contains all reported problems
> 	unit tested
>   
I tested it
> 	destined for the next merge window (or the current release)
>   
it is for next merge open window.
> *before* they are included.  The linux-next tree is for integration
> testing and to lower the impact of conflicts between subsystems in the
> next merge window.
>   
I would like to know that Kconfig changes (enabling some drivers) + Arnd
generic changes
not caused any problem which I should know about.
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
>   
next branch is based on my for-linus branch - There are only microblaze
specific changes in arch/microblaze
and these changes shouldn't have impact to any subsystem that's why I
don't expect any problem in it.

If I am wrong in anything let me know. This is my first "pull request to
linux-next".

I see the first problem that I should use {GIT PULL] prefix in subject.

Thanks,
Michal

-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-27 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-27  7:22 Microblaze merge Michal Simek
2009-05-27  8:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-27 13:06   ` Michal Simek [this message]
2009-05-27 13:24     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-27 13:33       ` Michal Simek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A1D3ACF.2090206@petalogix.com \
    --to=michal.simek@petalogix$(echo .)com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
    --cc=john.williams@petalogix$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox