Subject: Re: linux-next submission requirements (Was: [RFC PATCH] linker script: unify usage of discard definition)

From: Tejun Heo <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:18:02 +0900

Hello,

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> [This is not aimed just at you ... this patch just gave me an
> opportunity to point this out again.]
> 
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:37:28 +0900 Tejun Heo <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> This patch is on top of the current percpu#for-next.
>>
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu.git for-next
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> NOT_SIGNED_OFF_YET
> 
> Well, given no SOB and that this is a RFC patch, it should *not* be in a
> branch that is pulled into linux-next.

It's not _in_ the branch.  It's on _top_ of the branch.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun