From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation•org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: percpu/kvm/tip tree build failure
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:46:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091102161722.eea4358d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On 11/02/2009 07:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/user-return-notifier.c: In function 'fire_user_return_notifiers':
> kernel/user-return-notifier.c:45: error: expected expression before ')' token
>
> Introduced by commit 7c68af6e32c73992bad24107311f3433c89016e2 ("core,
> x86: Add user return notifiers") from the tip and kvm trees but revealed
> by commit e0fdb0e050eae331046385643618f12452aa7e73 ("percpu: add __percpu
> for sparse") from the percpu tree. Before that percpu tree commit,
> "put_cpu_var()" would compile without error (even though it really needs
> a parameter).
>
> I have applied the following patch for today.
>
Ingo, can you queue this on x86/entry?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-02 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-02 5:17 linux-next: percpu/kvm/tip tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-02 9:46 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-11-02 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 10:13 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-02 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
--cc=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox