From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm•linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel•crashing.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related)
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:32:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C56F317.7030008@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100802162810.GB4755@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 08/02/2010 09:28 AM, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:23:10AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Lots (if not all) of the arm builds failed for next-20100802 with these
>> errors:
>>
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'arm_bootmem_init':
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c:184: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_start_pfn'
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c:186: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_end_pfn'
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c:188: error: implicit declaration of function 'memblock_size_bytes'
>>
>> Caused by commit 53e16bfaf19346f59b3502e207aa66c61332075c ("memblock:
>> Introduce for_each_memblock() and new accessors, and use it") interacting
>> with commit 2778f62056ada442414392d7ccd41188bb631619 ("ARM: initial LMB
>> trial") and some others from the arm tree.
>
> Please, no, don't break the memblock code now. I'm not reworking the
> ARM implementation just as the merge window has opened - especially
> as the ARM implementation has now been pulled into other people's
> trees.
>
> If there's changes to memblock which haven't been in linux-next (which,
> as this is a new failure, that is most definitely the case), then they
> shouldn't be going into this merge window.
>
Ben, what's your tack on this?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-02 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-02 16:23 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-02 16:28 ` Russell King
2010-08-02 16:32 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-08-03 1:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-03 1:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-03 3:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-03 4:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-08-03 5:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-02 16:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-03 1:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-12 4:00 Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-12 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-12 6:25 ` David Miller
2010-11-29 2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-29 22:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-07 1:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-22 2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-22 22:00 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-29 2:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-29 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 14:30 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-07 1:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-07 15:37 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-14 5:49 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-14 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-13 14:29 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 6:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 6:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-16 7:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-16 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-16 9:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-09-16 7:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-16 7:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-09-16 7:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-13 14:06 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-13 19:17 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-23 16:31 Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-23 16:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-23 23:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-24 0:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-23 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C56F317.7030008@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
--cc=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
--cc=rmk@arm$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox