Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 4 (misc/pti)

From: J Freyensee <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:34:50 -0700

On 07/07/2011 09:32 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:29:59 -0700 J Freyensee wrote:
>
>> On 07/07/2011 08:14 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 13:45:41 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:09:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20110701:
>>>> when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/misc/pti.c:410: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_release_region'
>>>> drivers/misc/pti.c:859: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_request_region'
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stubs for these 2 functions could be added to include/linux/pci.h, but it would
>>>> make more sense to me just to make the driver depend on PCI since it seems to rely
>>>> on so many PCI functions.  or are the PCI pieces optional?
>>> ping.  still a problem in linux-next 20110706.
>> Thanks for the ping.
>>
>> Is there something you need me to do or look at?
>>
>> For Intel-Atom architectures, the MIPI PTI module does sit on the PCI
>> bus.  It's very much dependent upon the PCI bus for working
>> functionality and it's not optional.  So yes, it makes sense for the
>> driver to depend on PCI to be there and if PCI is not enabled on the
>> system, don't build the pti driver.
>>
>> Maybe it's a Kconfig dependency?
> Yes, please send/merge a patch that adds
> 	depends on PCI
> to "config INTEL_MID_PCI".

And just for confirmation, you want me to base this patch on the 
linux-next git tree, correct?

> Thanks.
> ---
> ~Randy
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***