Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (mmc)

From: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:49:39 -0700

On 10/11/11 02:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The linux-next tree is now available from
> git://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next.git as a temporary measure while
> the kernel.org servers are unavailable.
> 
> It may also turn up on git.kernel.org (depending on the mirroring).  The
> patch set is still absent, however.
> 
> Changes since 20111007:

When CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled:

In file included from next-2011-1011/drivers/mmc/card/sdio_uart.c:43:0:
next-2011-1011/include/linux/mmc/card.h:175:12: error: 'DISK_NAME_LEN' undeclared here (not in a function)

Deleting the #include <linux/mmc/card.h> fixes the sdio_uart.c build.
However, the same problem occurs in mmc/core/core.c:

In file included from next-2011-1011/drivers/mmc/core/core.c:30:0:
next-2011-1011/include/linux/mmc/card.h:175:12: error: 'DISK_NAME_LEN' undeclared here (not in a function)

Should mmc/core/ depend on BLOCK?  or should it just be made
to build even when BLOCK is not enabled?

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***